<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pink&#8217;s Sense of Meaning (in Rachel&#8217;s Numbers)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battis.net/2008/03/21/pinks-sense-of-meaning-in-rachels-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battis.net/2008/03/21/pinks-sense-of-meaning-in-rachels-numbers/</link>
	<description>...and I&#039;m all out of bubble gum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:51:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: battis.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Multiple Intelligences About Coding</title>
		<link>http://battis.net/2008/03/21/pinks-sense-of-meaning-in-rachels-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>battis.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Multiple Intelligences About Coding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battis.net/blog/2008/03/21/pinks-sense-of-meaning-in-rachels-numbers/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] Having just struck upon the similarities between Pink&#8217;s six new senses and Gardner&#8217;s multiple intelligences, I continue to be fascinated by examples of folks employing these ideas in creative ways: enter Basildon Coder, recently highlighted on Slashdot for describing a Wodehouse-ian approach to code refactoring. As always, I look at this and start to ponder how to use it in the classroom with my students: one of the real challenges that my students face is not the development of new code (although that is challenging) but figuring out how to use a body of code written by someone else (me, their classmates, some godawful Windows GDI API, etc.). I have been struck by the difficulty my students have faced this year in grasping the 50,000 foot view of coding &#8212; perhaps a visual representation like this might be a first step. Sort of a Powers of 10 for programming. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Having just struck upon the similarities between Pink&#8217;s six new senses and Gardner&#8217;s multiple intelligences, I continue to be fascinated by examples of folks employing these ideas in creative ways: enter Basildon Coder, recently highlighted on Slashdot for describing a Wodehouse-ian approach to code refactoring. As always, I look at this and start to ponder how to use it in the classroom with my students: one of the real challenges that my students face is not the development of new code (although that is challenging) but figuring out how to use a body of code written by someone else (me, their classmates, some godawful Windows GDI API, etc.). I have been struck by the difficulty my students have faced this year in grasping the 50,000 foot view of coding &#8212; perhaps a visual representation like this might be a first step. Sort of a Powers of 10 for programming. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crystal</title>
		<link>http://battis.net/2008/03/21/pinks-sense-of-meaning-in-rachels-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Crystal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battis.net/blog/2008/03/21/pinks-sense-of-meaning-in-rachels-numbers/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Seth:

I love you man.  Your summaries of your reads, most of the time, make me stop and  say hmm...  I think it is because you are open, honest and clear in your analysis.  Thank you for that.  While you come through 100% electronically, I hope that we can connect soon, in person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth:</p>
<p>I love you man.  Your summaries of your reads, most of the time, make me stop and  say hmm&#8230;  I think it is because you are open, honest and clear in your analysis.  Thank you for that.  While you come through 100% electronically, I hope that we can connect soon, in person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
